Some people live to eat. Some people eat to live. Which one is a better option? Or rather which type of person are you?
People who live to eat have the tendency to over-eat and might usually stuffed themselves with amount of foods greater than what their bodies will actually need. Despite the fact, these are also people who actually know how to enjoy lives and have a great taste for foods because eating is always one of their purpose in life. Afterall, what's so bad about having another hobby in life, right! In paper I read today, however, concludes that people from this group is more prone to obesity and might usually spend quite a lot on their food expenses.
Then, what about people who eat to live? Some might say these people will never grow fat since they will never eat more than what their bodies will need to continue as a living object and to carry out daily life activities. So, eating is more like a daily duty for these people rather than something enjoyable in life. If that's the case, then what's so bad about being in this group? No cons? Mmm..not really. How if one day, people like this have lose their purpose in life and don't see tomorrow necessary anymore to proceed on? Then, they might stop eating and starving themselves without perceiving it as a harm to their bodies. Wouldn't people from this group therefore more prone to aneroxia or gastric.
What do you think?
People who live to eat have the tendency to over-eat and might usually stuffed themselves with amount of foods greater than what their bodies will actually need. Despite the fact, these are also people who actually know how to enjoy lives and have a great taste for foods because eating is always one of their purpose in life. Afterall, what's so bad about having another hobby in life, right! In paper I read today, however, concludes that people from this group is more prone to obesity and might usually spend quite a lot on their food expenses.
Then, what about people who eat to live? Some might say these people will never grow fat since they will never eat more than what their bodies will need to continue as a living object and to carry out daily life activities. So, eating is more like a daily duty for these people rather than something enjoyable in life. If that's the case, then what's so bad about being in this group? No cons? Mmm..not really. How if one day, people like this have lose their purpose in life and don't see tomorrow necessary anymore to proceed on? Then, they might stop eating and starving themselves without perceiving it as a harm to their bodies. Wouldn't people from this group therefore more prone to aneroxia or gastric.
What do you think?
4 comments:
i think i'm in the middle of the two groups? =)
Yeah, i think being in the middle is the better option than at the extreme end. As for both sides bring unhealthy effects!
When are you going to US?
flight's 22nd june 2pm (uk time! haha)
Post a Comment